(November 3, 2015 at 11:12 am)Irrational Wrote:(November 3, 2015 at 11:04 am)Drich Wrote: So we ready for romans 4?
I think I'll start a new thread for that one. since we are 30+ pages in and still discussing Chapter 1 and 2.
Perhaps your idea isn't appealing at all to any atheist here. Why pretend it is? Is this something about having your ego boosted?
It seemed to appeal to you when you thought you had a viable objection...
Again just incase you missed it. the study in Romans can help someone like you tear down a 'christian' arguement based on the idea that their particular form of Christianity is the 'right one.' But it seems you want to stick to the bart er-ham? method of failing hard on basic theological points to try and discredit The very source material that would make an honest christian question absolutly everything he believes.
When I was an atheist/bully I sought oppertunities like this. To show the thumpers that their religion did not line up with what the bible actually said. Then I'd ask which do you love more. Your God repersented by the bible or your religion? or i'd ask if the bible says the oppsite of what your religion says, are you sure you have the right one?
Contextual consecutive scripture always trumps cherry picked doctrine. (10 different verses that formulates a single idea) Here the Book of Romans outlines and defines the Gospel/our relationship with sin. Which is vastly different than what most 'christian' religion teaches.
