Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion

[Mister Agenda]

Why do we need to refute the article? Are you saying either all atheists make bad arguments or no atheists make bad arguments? False dichotomy.

Some atheists make bad arguments. I'm sure everyone here would agree to that statement,

Again, so what? I'll pick apart bad atheist's arguments as much as I would bad theist's arguments.

If you were doing your job faithfully, padawan, this place wouldn't be the garden of logical horrors, the septic tank of thought that it is right now. 

Where are the substantive critiques of theistic claims? Why are so many atheists foaming at the mouth instead of using reason and following the evidence?

Why does this place make atheism look like a complete shitstain as opposed to something that's intellectually, ethically and socially respectable?

Forget about the plethora of comments directed at me that fail, completely, to engage with the point of what I'm saying but rather descend into slanging matches (which I inevitably win anyhow). Just look at the comments in this discussion so far.

Yours comes closest to addressing the point in the article, and yet it is clear you haven't even read the whole thing.

Where are the substantive theistic claims? I'd love to hear one. Please go on.