RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
November 10, 2015 at 11:23 am
(November 10, 2015 at 10:41 am)ChadWooters Wrote:(November 9, 2015 at 8:06 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You should probably read up on quantum mechanics, Chad. It refutes all three claims.
But yes, do go on.
“What the (Bleep) Do You Know.” Since its discovery, quantum mechanics has been used to justify the claims of New Age hucksters, so-called non-dualists, proponents of idealism, and various mystical beliefs. Disagreements of interpretation abound. This doesn’t not make you wrong; it only means that you should take pause before making pronouncements about what QM research does and does not reveal. As a layman, I have only a basic understanding of it; the physics classes I took as an architect only touched on the basics. While I follow with interest more recent discoveries like quantum erasure and retro-causality, I generally steer clear of relying on the findings of natural science to inform metaphysical issues. Doing so puts the cart before the horse.
Fortunately it doesn’t take an advanced degree in physics to recognize the incoherence of the self-refuting position you have taken. The findings of all natural science inquiries, including QM, presuppose the fundamental principles I listed. If the results of a QM experiment were to invalidate the first principles of its own inquiry then its own results are invalidated.
That leaves open the question of what to make of quantum oddities and puzzles. Nothing prevents the existence of contraries in a particular provided they are not contrary in the same respect. For example suffering is contrary to joy and yet an athlete can suffer greatly during a marathon and still experience the joy of achievement. I am not suggesting that I know how to apply that idea to any one quantum puzzle. I only bring it up to suggest how such puzzles can be resolved without falling into self-refutation.
But they're all wrong, Chad. Perhaps not in the physical, logical sense; but all of your four conjectures all have cracks in their armor. For me, the most visible fault line runs across "nothing comes from nothing, however, everything comes from nothing."