Fr0d0? 'True for you'?
We're talking about the existence of an entity in reality here and how it can be understood - according to you - through 'faith'.
If God exists then he exists. If he doesn't then he doesn't.
If it's true for you are you suggesting that God exist for some and not for others?
So if he's 'true for you' what you mean inside your very own head?
Where is his actual existence in REALITY? How can faith have any bearing on that? And why is God treated as a special case?
You need evidence for other claims about reality (scientific claims) so why not God? It's nonsense.
'True for you'. How silly.
We're not talking about subjective truth here like 'true love', or a 'truly good sandwich' or something.
We're talking about the actually existence of something. Either God truly does exist or he truly doesn't. And there is no God.
EvF
We're talking about the existence of an entity in reality here and how it can be understood - according to you - through 'faith'.
If God exists then he exists. If he doesn't then he doesn't.
If it's true for you are you suggesting that God exist for some and not for others?
So if he's 'true for you' what you mean inside your very own head?
Where is his actual existence in REALITY? How can faith have any bearing on that? And why is God treated as a special case?
You need evidence for other claims about reality (scientific claims) so why not God? It's nonsense.
'True for you'. How silly.
We're not talking about subjective truth here like 'true love', or a 'truly good sandwich' or something.
We're talking about the actually existence of something. Either God truly does exist or he truly doesn't. And there is no God.
EvF
