Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Red_Wind]

How is that a contradiction?

We have yet to see the involvement of a god or see the need for the involvement of a god.
If a god does exist then he is most likely not related to any of the religions on earth.

Don't you realize that you just made an unsubstantiated statement?
How would you know whether there is a God that control everything or the universe doesn't need a controller when in fact physical science has yet to answer this question?
You create a belief in your mind that the situation is such and such which come with no evidence of whatsoever therefore as such it become a dogma.

I am afraid Rob that the one who declare victory is Little Rik.
Now that your mate stated his belief that .........the world can work without the existence of a god.......which of course is an unfounded statement and belief Little Rik got the evidence that atheism is based on beliefs.      

Well then let me put it another way, there is no evidence that a god is needed for the world to work as of yet.
That would be my opinion, not belief.Unlike a belief, i can change my opinion (my opinion is that belief is part of the subconscious)

There is no physical evidence.
That doesn't mean that evidence can be found elsewhere.
In any case you did state that there is no need for a God without backing your statement with evidence.  

So my statement that there is a lack of evidence needs to backed up with evidence?

Don't you get bored of these back and forth arguments?

BTW what religion do you follow?, do you have a reason to follow your particular religion or is it just blind faith?, what makes your religion/god any more true compared to other religions/gods?

Your thread has already been derailed and most of your opening statements have been debunked so i don't see what use this thread is other then entertainment.