(November 17, 2015 at 2:39 am)Darkstar Wrote: About those gun laws...
In France, we have this,
http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/france
Quote:In France, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population is
2012: 0.21
2011: 0.22
2010: 0.19
2009: 0.21
2008: 0.22
2007: 0.15
2006: 0.17
2005: 0.19
2004: 0.21
2003: 0.20
2002: 0.25
2001: 0.26
2000: 0.25
1999: 0.26
1998: 0.29
1997: 0.37
1994: 0.44
compared to this in the USA:
http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states
Quote:In the United States, the annual rate of firearm homicide per 100,000 population is
2013: 3.55
2012: 3.70
2011: 3.55
2010: 3.59
2009: 3.75
2008: 4.01
2007: 4.19
2006: 4.29
2005: 4.18
2004: 3.97
2003: 4.11
2002: 4.11
2001: 3.98
2000: 3.84
1999: 3.88
1998: 3.37
1993: 7.07
I don't know about you, but from where I'm standing those laws look pretty darn effective to me.
Also, this: http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compar...,192,30,25
I think it would be great if people started examining overall gun stats, rather than making emotional arguments about individual cases of violence. Anti-gun people do it with every shooting in the US. However the same people will say that Frances laws have nothing to do with what happened there. As though examination is only needed on one side of the gun issue.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)