Yeah, those crappy emotional arguments like "School children shouldn't be afraid to go to school because some teenagers decided to shoot the place up." I mean that's fucking stupid to say "EMOTIONAL ARGUMENTS! OMG GUN CONTROL DID NOT STOP THE PARIS ATTACKS!" Well guess the fuck what? If there hadn't been any fucking gun control in the country, the people of France might have to be fucking worried about the same stupid fucking mass shootings we have in this country in addition to their terrorist attack.
You might as well not even call gun nuts "gun" nuts, they're just fucking nuts. Period. Every time there is a mass shooting in the United States, it's been by someone who would NOT NORMALLY HAVE ACCESS TO A FUCKING ARMORY OF WEAPONS AND FUNDING THAT ONLY TERRORISTS HAVE.
Do you really fucking think that the Sandy Hook Shooter had the connections and money to buy a fucking gun on the black market? I guess it's an emotional argument to say that gun control would FUCKING REDUCE the number of mass shootings in this country significantly. I guess it's an emotional argument to say that with gun control we could have prevented many of the tragedies we see in our country.
On the other side you have fucking fantastic logic like "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." Fuck that. Once the bad guy has the gun, you're not going to stop him shit-for-brains. The fucking idea is to stop the stupid fucker and other stupid fuckers from getting guns in the first place. And you know what? It would fucking work because most people in this country aren't members of an international terrorist organization that has access to military hardware. It's that fucking simple. Really, if you want to talk emotional arguments it's you ammosexuals that have the emotional arguments. Because you love your guns and don't want them taken away. You have this stupid fucking hero fantasy that you're going to be able to save the day with your handgun. It's your wet dream to be able to shoot someone and still be called a hero, but without going to war because you know you won't get the recognition that you want so fucking bad.
You might as well not even call gun nuts "gun" nuts, they're just fucking nuts. Period. Every time there is a mass shooting in the United States, it's been by someone who would NOT NORMALLY HAVE ACCESS TO A FUCKING ARMORY OF WEAPONS AND FUNDING THAT ONLY TERRORISTS HAVE.
Do you really fucking think that the Sandy Hook Shooter had the connections and money to buy a fucking gun on the black market? I guess it's an emotional argument to say that gun control would FUCKING REDUCE the number of mass shootings in this country significantly. I guess it's an emotional argument to say that with gun control we could have prevented many of the tragedies we see in our country.
On the other side you have fucking fantastic logic like "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." Fuck that. Once the bad guy has the gun, you're not going to stop him shit-for-brains. The fucking idea is to stop the stupid fucker and other stupid fuckers from getting guns in the first place. And you know what? It would fucking work because most people in this country aren't members of an international terrorist organization that has access to military hardware. It's that fucking simple. Really, if you want to talk emotional arguments it's you ammosexuals that have the emotional arguments. Because you love your guns and don't want them taken away. You have this stupid fucking hero fantasy that you're going to be able to save the day with your handgun. It's your wet dream to be able to shoot someone and still be called a hero, but without going to war because you know you won't get the recognition that you want so fucking bad.
