(December 3, 2015 at 6:22 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: CL, evidence can be shown by definition. If you can't show it to someone else, it really doesn't count as meaningful evidence.
Also, you and I have conversed before about the inescapable fact that Gaud' s omniscience and omnipotence would combine to rule out both personal responsibility and free will. Good to see that sunk in so well
If you witnessed Johnny kill Billy, would YOU know that Johnny killed Billy? Unless some other form of evidence comes in, you can't prove to other people that Johnny is guilty unless they chose to take your word for it. But you personally would still have enough information to know he did, for yourself.
We did have that conversation, but that doesn't mean I agreed with you.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
