RE: So your an Athiest
December 5, 2015 at 3:32 pm
(This post was last modified: December 5, 2015 at 3:38 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(December 5, 2015 at 3:30 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:Whether or not that uncited claim is true is not above debate, but the possibilities they imply for life under a broader range of conditions remain strong.(December 5, 2015 at 2:34 pm)AAA Wrote: Yes life exists in places you would not expect to find it. But extremophiles are more complex than normal bacteria, so even if you believed in evolution these would certainly not have been able to be the first that evolved. I think the most broad definition of life that could be given is something capable of taking molecules from the environment and use them to produce accurate copies of itself. I don't think I'm being narrow minded, and I want to discover new things. Just because I'm a Christian doesn't mean I won't be a good researcher. Look at virtually every researcher before the 1800s.
That you call them "extremophiles" is rather interesting, considering how life, when it first began 4 billion years ago, did so under similar conditions - the atmosphere and ocean was choked with volcanic activity and no oxygen. It was hardly extreme to these life forms, which made do with what they had available. That's what life does.
Mr. Hanky loves you!