RE: So your an Athiest
December 6, 2015 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: December 6, 2015 at 3:46 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
"Naturalism of the gaps" - oh, great masturbating Kreist on a rotating dildo! We don't claim we "know" that there was no designer, only that we doubt it for a very good reason: there is no better reason to believe that idea than the unfounded claims which shitheads persistently make! AAA cannot prove his claim, and now he tries to discredit us for saying we don't know when in fact we don't! Scientists don't know how the universe began, nor how life began on our planet, and they don't lie about it. They have theories, but they are presented as theories, not as absolutes. That life evolved from simple to complex is a certain fact, and its ultimate origin need not be known for anyone to call it that.
I'd say I've had enough of AAA's mental masturbation in this thread and quit already, but I think this is the stuff for a new law, along the line of Godwin's: The longer one attempts to prove a claim which is unfalsifiable to those who examine it through reason, the more likely he is to resort to insulting dishonesty in a desperate attempt to go on believing it himself.
What should this law be called?
I'd say I've had enough of AAA's mental masturbation in this thread and quit already, but I think this is the stuff for a new law, along the line of Godwin's: The longer one attempts to prove a claim which is unfalsifiable to those who examine it through reason, the more likely he is to resort to insulting dishonesty in a desperate attempt to go on believing it himself.
What should this law be called?
Mr. Hanky loves you!
