(December 9, 2015 at 7:14 pm)Judi Lynn Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 7:08 pm)athrock Wrote: It's a common but technically inaccurate assertion that there is NO evidence for God. There is evidence.
Just not the kind of empirical* evidence that some people seem to think is required.
*based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic. (see? theory and pure logic are other forms of evidence)
Are you really this stupid? We have been asking and asking and asking and asking and asking and asking and asking and asking.... for this fucking evidence. So where the hell is it if you claim it's there so much?
Well, that was rude. What have I done to deserve being called stupid?
Have you ever read any books written by believers or non-believers going over the issues for and against? If so, then you already know the issues that are debated.
This must be like Obama's refusal to use the phrase "radical Islam"...once he says it, then it's a thing. Until then, it's workplace violence. Similarly, maybe folks here (you included?) don't want to concede that there is evidence (even if it is "weak" in their opinion) because it's better to simply deny that any evidence exists AT ALL.
That way, you don't have to actually think about it. Which may bring us full circle to the point of the OP.