(December 13, 2015 at 10:22 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(December 13, 2015 at 1:46 pm)Amine Wrote: Also, there is a massive difference between "WWJD" and "WWMD". I'm not sure Christianity doesn't have a capacity to be reformed that Islam simply lacks. Jesus would never have called for the crusades. That was an actual case of religious people not really following their religion. Muhammad, on the other hand, was a guy who went around committing atrocities. The Muslims who don't spread Islam by the sword are the ones not really following their religion.
And by which evidence did you go, exactly ?
the same sources that Sunnies and Shia use to justify their crimes ?
I mean where can you run from this verse in the Quran :
( Sura 2 Verse 256 ) There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.
I mean, this is the doctrine and constitution of Mohammed; how did he expand religion by the sword if his own constitution included this ?
Please, don't throw the acts of Sunnies and Shia on Mohammed. The Islamic conquests took place after Mohammed's death.
Though, I do agree with you on that Jesus would never call for crusades, He too -Jesus- believed that there shall be no compulsion in the acceptance of the religion.
Oh...fuck it, why bother being fair with you? It must be that it isn't the religion, that it's a race thing instead, because the sunnis and shias began with sand-up-their-ass Arabs, Persians, and Turks.
Mr. Hanky loves you!