(December 17, 2015 at 8:31 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(December 17, 2015 at 5:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: LOL, I never said it was. That's why I keep saying you're strawmanning. Did you read the post you are responding to? And all the other posts I have been writing for the past 4 pages?
I even bolded it in blue for you up top, for your convenience.
And there's this too, which was a post I made to YOU specifically, just last night:
Soooo yeah, this is really bizarre lol. I don't understand why I'm accused of saying it's not rape if there's arousal.
Nothing bizarre here, CL, except maybe the question you raised (presuming you are an adult). I wansn't quite sure that you understood clearly enough, and I wanted to make sure, that's all.
(December 17, 2015 at 6:29 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Well just so you don't think I'm going nuts, here is where they both make accusations:
The "moron" he is referring to is me, btw.
So, as you can see, I'm being accused of thinking arousal = consent, and of thinking rape is only a vaginal penetration of male on female.
I think you're reading too much into this. I suppose I did too. Maybe Brian as well, as with everyone else involved in this pile-up.
There, misunderstanding cleared up! Can we all move on now?
Sounds good to me!
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
