Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2025, 4:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Dawkins' Argument.
#1
The Dawkins' Argument.
It's so simple and I have myself wondering, "Gee, why didn't I think of that?!"

But, let me state it simply, if only somewhat inaccurately (and, I admit that I am probably being at least somewhat inaccurate, and I am sure that others will correct me on this point.)


Quote:Complex things arise from simpler things which arise from even simpler things; anything and everything, without any exceptions whatsoever, comes into being from the interactions of simpler things.


God, if "he/she/it/all of the above/some of the above/none of the above" truly existed "he/she/it/non-it" could, of course, reveal "himself/herself/itself/no-self" at any time and at any place in any instance, and yet, god remains silent and elusive.  As with Big Foot, one must appeal to all sorts of reasons beyond this "divine hiddenness", wondering why Sasquatch does not at least crap somewhere in the forest.  Talking to god is one thing, having him/her/it talk to you is quite another; the former is seen as "normal", the latter can get you committed!

In spite of god being an entirely faith-based entity with an almost limitless set of beliefs & opinions about who god is or what god has revealed or what Man must do to please god, why are left with the inexplicable question of god's origins, a being who, if he/she/it truly exists, is, arguably, more complex than we, his/her/its creation!  And, yet, all of us, without any exceptions whatsoever, started off microscopic, the result of a long, complex, yet traceable, chain of microscopic events, all the way back in time.  Ditto for every single object in our existence, from our phones to our cars to our TVs.  And, yet, many still accept the existence of an uncaused, complex entity such as "god", content not to apply to him/she/it the fundamental standard which we, as human beings, apply to every other single thing in our lives.

One solution to all of this is that human beings may simply be wired for belief, that evolution, via natural selection, simply conferred a survival advantage upon individuals & groups who would embrace a hierarchical view of nature, with the ultimate hierarchy being in "heaven", which is the sky above us.  In this respect, organized religion is simply a car which is running on fumes; an entity, such as the Catholic Church, has influence today solely due to the fact that it had influence in the past, which means that organized religion, Catholicism included, is doomed to inevitable extinction.  For instance, countries, such as Sweden and France, are showing no signs of atheists converting back to traditional religion; if anything, the exact opposite is true, the slow erosion of religious faith and interest.

In the (hopefully, near) future, Dawkins' argument will be universally (or, nearly so) accepted, as it just makes sense.  Everything in our experience attests to it being true!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The Dawkins' Argument. - by Jehanne - December 20, 2015 at 10:20 am
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by LastPoet - December 20, 2015 at 11:23 am
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by abaris - December 20, 2015 at 12:13 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Brian37 - December 20, 2015 at 12:45 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Edwardo Piet - December 20, 2015 at 11:25 am
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Cyberman - December 20, 2015 at 12:31 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Edwardo Piet - December 20, 2015 at 12:34 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Nontheist - December 20, 2015 at 2:03 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Cyberman - December 20, 2015 at 12:41 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Edwardo Piet - December 20, 2015 at 12:46 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Confused Ape - December 20, 2015 at 1:48 pm
RE: The Dawkins' Argument. - by Brian37 - December 20, 2015 at 12:56 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights. Nishant Xavier 63 7637 July 15, 2023 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Dawkins loses humanist title Silver 165 16910 June 6, 2021 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Richard Dawkins interviews Saudi Arabian atheist Rana Ahmad AniKoferBo 2 1117 July 22, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Ricky Gervais won Dawkins award this year Fake Messiah 13 3526 September 6, 2019 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Dawkins writing kid's version of "The God Delusion" - you mad bro? Silver 35 8854 August 2, 2018 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Geoff Robson has a hardon for Dawkins Silver 7 2266 May 10, 2018 at 5:55 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  What are your thoughts on Richard Dawkins? NuclearEnergy 96 19217 December 6, 2017 at 3:06 am
Last Post: Bow Before Zeus
  Hitchens, Dawkins, Hawking, Ehrman, Coin, Sagan: Where are the Woman? Rhondazvous 44 6687 January 14, 2017 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: Mr Greene
  John Lennox and Richard Dawkins TheMonster 8 2858 October 14, 2016 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: TheMonster
  Love Letters to Richard Dawkins Czechlervitz30 6 2732 July 20, 2016 at 7:37 am
Last Post: The Viking



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)