Amherst Student Was Expelled for Rape. But He Was Raped, Evidence Shows.

[Brakeman]

.. complainant admitted that not only had she consented to the sex, but that she was its moving force.”

Jones’ original complaint alleges the oral sex had been nonconsensual the entire time. However, she later told an investigator that she performed oral sex willingly at the beginning and it became nonconsensual “’on a break’ during the sex act,” per Doe’s complaint.

A simple glance at the news articles easily shows that there is too little information given to be sufficient summary of the evidence that would be convincing enough to pass through at least two hearings.

The articles are purely from the man's complaint in federal court trying to find a sympathetic ear. He had exhaused the university's disciplinary process where he was found to be guilty to a preponderance of evidence. That evidence against him was obviously not included in his legal complaint and not included in the extremely one sided reporting. He's telling his side while the woman is stuck answering in court again.

You seem to think that university juries are so ignorant to human nature and so anti man biased that they convicted him just on a girls's whim years ago.

I'm sure the university disciplinary jury saw evidence of force, and force has no place in sex. Some drunks are mean and it does not take much imagination to come up with likely scenarios that weren't included in the complaint such as black eyes and other bruises that other witnesses might have seen. Also curious is the lack of defenders on his claim. Where does his then girlfriend stand?

Nah .. I smell an asshole here just trying to get away with a vicious drunk attack. Fuck him.