My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument

[Pat Mustard]

Not sure you can say I'm wrong.

Didn't say you were wrong, just said that you were an ignorant disrespectful little shit.*

My reasons are valid,

What reason? What validity?

so couldn't it just be that you atheists have an emotional connection to your atheism and get butthurt when someone points out its falsehood?

Delicate, when you're losing an argument, it is simply stupid to project your own reactions and personality on to others. It would be much better from you to listen to those of us who have replied to you coherently and demolished your arguments in other threads, rather than running off into a fantasy world where you are the "true scholar" and us poor atheists are so stupid we go off into a rage because we cannot comprehend your arguments^. Oh and the only one getting butt hurt is yourself, as proved by your frequent flouncing out of threads you start and disappearing once your ideas are shown to be vapid and worthless. You don't like reality, then I suggest you stay away from here.

*Doesn't mean you're right, though. You've shown nothing in any of your posts to indicate to me that I wouldn't be better sticking my head out of a window rather than asking you if it was raining.
^Which, in reality, and not inside your head, are pretty bad arguments because they neither are falsifiable, nor do they explain the evidence we have for reality.