My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument

[Brian37]

Butthurt is claiming an all  powerful God while needing to be his public relation department. You telling us an all powerful being needs mortals to be salespeople for him or kill to defend him? Can be that powerful if he cant do his own dirty work.

No idea what you're talking about buddy.

Yep thats the problem, you have no ideas, parrots repeat what they are sold. Ideas are why you are typing on a product of science, ideas are what got humans to the moon and probes on Mars.

Now THINK, don't simply react, think.

Does it make any sense to you at all, that an allegedly all powerful being would need to  14 billion years to lead us to today, 4 billion years for life to get today, then only 200,000 years ago leads our species to our current form and then sits on his hands only till about 10,000 years ago to finally give humans the gift of organizing communities and writing? Then another 2000 plus years to get to modern technology? I'd hardly call that efficient.

1. "God works in mysterious ways"
2. "God can do what he wants"
3. "God doesn't have to explain himself to you"

Ok fine, lets see if those three lines still make sense with the following.

1. "Allah works in mysterious ways"
2. "Allah can do what he wants"
3. "Allah doesn't have to explain himself to you"

1. "Osiris works in mysterious ways"
2. "Osiris can do what he wants"
3. "Osiris doesn't have to explain himself to you".

Now why is it you reject two of those groups but accept one? Is it really that a god exists? Or is it merely that you like the idea of having a god? You rightfully reject two of those groups. Maybe you should use that logic and aim it at your own claims.