What do you think of William Lane Craig?

[robvalue]

Craig knows that most people are not well versed in logical fallacies. So if he buries them deep and surrounds them with irrelevant, clever sounding words, he knows people who already want his conclusions to be true aren't going to look closely; or even be able to spot the problem if they do.

This reliance on people's inability to see the flaws in his arguments, which he is well aware of, is what makes him such a con man.

If there's anyone out there with any respect for his arguments, please bring a reference to your favourite theistic argument he has made so we can destroy it. I will guarantee it will either be trivial, irrelevant, or will contain one or more fallacies/dishonest techniques.