This post by Craig really shows his blatant dishonesty:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/honesty-t...gv-theorem
So, when a physicists/cosmologist agrees with Craig, that individual's work is elevated to the status of at least quasi-infallible, however, when that same scientist disagrees with Craig, that person's work is subject to attack and distortion.
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/honesty-t...gv-theorem
Quote:The fifth paragraph is especially gratifying personally. As for Vilenkin’s theological views, while I would never rejoice that someone is not a Christian, I find his agnosticism to be helpful in that no one can accuse him of having a theological axe to grind in his defense of the universe’s beginning. As for his proffered natural explanation of the universe’s beginning, I interact with it in Reasonable Faith, pp. 115-16, and in the Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, pp. 183-4 (with Jim Sinclair).
So, when a physicists/cosmologist agrees with Craig, that individual's work is elevated to the status of at least quasi-infallible, however, when that same scientist disagrees with Craig, that person's work is subject to attack and distortion.
