| Poll: William Lane Craig is.. This poll is closed. |
|||
| A conscious, lying charlatan | 28 | 59.57% | |
| Sincere, but a lying manipulator, brainwashed to believe "at all costs". | 11 | 23.40% | |
| A sincere believer but open to change. | 0 | 0% | |
| A sincere scholar in search of the truth, ready to change. | 1 | 2.13% | |
| Other (please explain). | 7 | 14.89% | |
| Total | 47 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
What do you think of William Lane Craig?
|
 (January 24, 2016 at 8:17 pm)Evie Wrote: WLC? Awesome? Would that be a "sarcastic" option? Well how else am I going to live life like I'm in a Telltale Game as an elaborate coping mechanism if the sarcastic option isn't present in every single social interaction Evie? What am I supposed to do? Choose the "..." option? Thats only funny once.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.  
We get enough trolls around here though; we don't need pretend ones.
Just sayin'.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
This post by Craig really shows his blatant dishonesty:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/honesty-t...gv-theorem Quote:The fifth paragraph is especially gratifying personally. As for Vilenkin’s theological views, while I would never rejoice that someone is not a Christian, I find his agnosticism to be helpful in that no one can accuse him of having a theological axe to grind in his defense of the universe’s beginning. As for his proffered natural explanation of the universe’s beginning, I interact with it in Reasonable Faith, pp. 115-16, and in the Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, pp. 183-4 (with Jim Sinclair). So, when a physicists/cosmologist agrees with Craig, that individual's work is elevated to the status of at least quasi-infallible, however, when that same scientist disagrees with Craig, that person's work is subject to attack and distortion. (January 24, 2016 at 9:45 pm)athrock Wrote:(January 24, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Evie Wrote: Esq you kick fucking ass. Just sayin' Wasn't the first to speak God in your estimation?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.  |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
