RE: An Intersting conversation I had with a Creationist friend of mine.
February 9, 2016 at 4:20 am
(February 8, 2016 at 9:59 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:(February 8, 2016 at 8:36 pm)Cecelia Wrote: Explain to him that he needs to learn what a theory is.
Evolution is a scientific theory.
Creationism is a hypothesis.
Then explain to him that he needs to read sources that aren't creationist craze.
Creationism isn't even a hypothesis. It's a wild assed guess based on cherry picked evidence and logical fallacies.
(February 9, 2016 at 4:09 am)maestroanth Wrote: I don't understand the argument of there is no proof of gaining genetic information. He needs to elaborate more because it simply doesn't make sense. How the Hell do homo erectus evolve up to homo Neanderthalis without gaining information? I mean if he believes there is proof of losing information, that's the same as gaining information because information that changing is both depending on your point of view.. Like if you change a byte from 0 to 1 you simultaneously "gain" the 1 while "losing" the 0.
Evolution from my understanding isn't considered a theory anymore.
Well even a good deal of religious fraternities now accept evolution over creationism.
They have just changed their argument to say basically it shows Gods work is even more beautiful than we first thought.
