(March 4, 2011 at 5:41 pm)theVOID Wrote: I know it is, and it does naught to change the fact that you can take on board the responsibilities required without the government forcing you to buy a product from a corporation, the likes of whom most probably lobbied for the scenario because it's a favourable circumstance in their benefit, one that benefits the insurance provider more so than the people whom are at risk of losing property - There is absolutely no need for the fascism when it comes to taking on the responsibilities - The system here in NZ is a prime example of that.
Well in Portugal you are forced to have insurance, but there are a bunch of what i think are stupid rules, like if the other guy is drunk and bashes against your vehicle the insurance companies don't pay...
