(March 22, 2016 at 12:10 am)AFTT47 Wrote:(March 21, 2016 at 10:28 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: My question, is why do we ignore all of these people that have worked in the government and military who say they want the public to know the truth about what they have seen or been involved in?
Occam's Razor, for starters. Tremendous logical inconsistencies for another.
I don't know if occams razor can be thrown into this debate, because essentially it means using preconceived notions to formulate conclusions. What we are talking about here is information that is still secret and classified above top secret. So to say use the simplest explanation based off of criteria that hasn't been made public yet officially is the best way to form a conclusion would be foolish. We are talking about information that people in the government says needs to be released to the public and scientific community to study, and until that happens all conclusions are simply based on a lack of information.
