(March 16, 2011 at 3:02 am)Rayaan Wrote: Jesus according to the Islamic perspective (watch the first 2 minutes at least):
Which isn't terribly relevant to a historical (not theological) discussion. We're discussing whether or not a historical Jesus existed at all and what we can know about him outside of the myths that were circulated about him. Islam itself came along several centuries later in another country and offers no historical documents from the time and place where Jesus would have lived. You can talk about Muslim theology and opinion all you like but that doesn't contribute anything to our historical understanding.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
