Believe it or not you are not important enough for me to "get in your face". I asked you to address the question and end petty sniping. To which you have replied with a pointless ad hominem as if that has ANY bearing on the argument.
I am fully entitled to ask for a warrant as to why I should study self-reinforcing doctorines of so called mainstream xtianity, rather than others as you have no data (only an appeal to sheer weight of numbers) as to why its superior to any other form. It seems that unless we are theology scholars we cannot debate such issues, but unfortunately for you these and other contradictions in the xtian conception of a god have not gone away, and are debated by people who know more about the subject than you or I. I would therefore suspect that whichever 'doctorine' you suggest I should aquaint myself with, will NOT slam dunk your position.
I am fully entitled to ask for a warrant as to why I should study self-reinforcing doctorines of so called mainstream xtianity, rather than others as you have no data (only an appeal to sheer weight of numbers) as to why its superior to any other form. It seems that unless we are theology scholars we cannot debate such issues, but unfortunately for you these and other contradictions in the xtian conception of a god have not gone away, and are debated by people who know more about the subject than you or I. I would therefore suspect that whichever 'doctorine' you suggest I should aquaint myself with, will NOT slam dunk your position.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
