(April 15, 2016 at 9:29 pm)AJW333 Wrote:(April 13, 2016 at 4:55 am)pocaracas Wrote: God is in your head...inductive reasoning, per the definition here presented, states that this claim of mine is probable.Not sure what you mean. Can you rephrase the question?
Now what?
Premise: god is in your head. The concept of god is in your head. Everything you think you know about god flows from what's in your head.
This supplies strong evidence for the conclusion that... god doesn't exist outside believers' heads.
Applied inductive reasoning.
Since you want to apply inductive reasoning to argue for the real existence of a god and I've just shown you how the same kind of reasoning can lead to the exact opposite conclusion... now what?
Of what value is inductive reasoning, if it can easily lead to contradictory conclusions?