(April 4, 2011 at 5:16 pm)lrh9 Wrote: If it came down to one vote it wouldn't matter. The Supreme Court would decide the election like it did in 2000 - when the difference was more than one vote.
Yeah, I missed that part of the Constitution that says "in the event of a close election, the Supreme Court has the power to stop a recount and simply appoint a President for the sake of expediency."
My home state is Kentucky, which is permanently painted red on those newsroom election maps. Consequently, my vote doesn't count, thanks to the winner-take-all electoral college system. My vote doesn't count in the primary election either, since Kentucky goes so late that it's a done-deal by the time it reaches us. Consequently, I'm going to vote 3rd party. If enough solid-red-state progressive voters go 3rd party, we can always hope it sends a message. Hey, it could happen.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist