(May 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm)AAA Wrote:(May 20, 2016 at 5:57 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You're the prosecution. I'm the jury. Make your case and I'll consider it.
Ok, why is a system of electrical communication not considered evidence of intelligent design when the only known cause of such things is intelligence?
1. A question is not an argument. If you have to resort to a question, that suggests that you haven't even formed an argument, that you're hoping the person you're talking to will create your argument for you.
2. Circular argument: You are assuming that the only known cause of electrical communication is intelligent design because you are assuming that life was intelligently designed.