(May 21, 2016 at 12:36 pm)AAA Wrote:(May 20, 2016 at 10:17 pm)robvalue Wrote: Straw: meet grasp.
For any scientific claim to be meaningful, it must be falsifiable.
What is the failure criteria here? What would indicate that some life form was not intelligently designed, and how do you know this? If you have no failure criteria, you are simply making an unecessary assumption.
If the claim is nothing more than a resemblance, then it's of absolutely no significance. I don't know who is supposed to be convinced, or of what. I imagine it's the self being convinced that such beliefs are rational by an equivocation of language.
How is evolution a falsifiable explanation for life's systems?
This question removes all doubt that you know nothing about evolution or even the scientific method. Go harass some other site Trip F. Your willful ignorance, constant repetition and your incessant argument from incredulity are getting tiresome.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.