(May 21, 2016 at 8:27 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(May 21, 2016 at 2:42 pm)AAA Wrote: There's so much going on in the cell that you don't even want to acknowledge. There are control mechanisms that make our electronic circuits rediculously childish. There are layers upon layers of information that are being continuously unpacked, read, and repacked. But you complain that your esophagus is too close to your trachea? You better be thankful that someone just happened to have an epiglottis in order for our species to survive the evolution of that setup.
You didn't acknowledge GB's the point; that an all powerful, all intelligent being should have used a little foresight in his planning. All you gave in this response is more red herrings. I wonder why they is?
Well I think I did acknowledge the point, but if you want me to reiterate it I can. I disagree with the assertion that the designer didn't use foresight. In fact, if the designer created life without some template to go by, the designer had tremendous foresight. If you asked us to design a cell today, we could not do it even with natural cells to use as a template. Imagine how impossible it would be for us to try to design a cell without any such template. It would take tremendous foresight.