(May 23, 2016 at 4:14 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: He never said that he knows that no events had supernatural causes, so there's that.
...because that assertion is based on something we know (in particular, the fact that all known causes, events, and objects are natural, and none are "supernatural").
Perhaps I parsed his sentence wrong, but that still seems to be a positive claim of knowledge. Either way, I should not have responded to a post that ends with a jerkoff emoji.