Can't prove the supernatural God

[SofaKingHigh]

So........let me break that down:

You don't believe the NT because the NT says so, you believe what it says was true because of various parts of the NT?

You're not helping yourself here Stevie.

I should just stop this now, because this is more circular than my wife's rather lovely arse.....however, would you care to share the "other historical context (that*)  are reliable?" please?

You really can't understand the difference between examining if a series of events happened and the 27 sources that describe these events? Answer the question I asked: then by that standard we could never believe anything that happened in the past on any subject?

By corroborating evidence from various different sources, the more the better.

As far as I can see you haven't examined anything other than the Bible, and it makes no difference as to whether you split it up into 27 sources to make it sound more credible my friend, it's still the Bible.

I asked for your other reliable sources please.