Atheism vs. God's Existence

[AAA]

That part of our physiology is consistent with evolution, but it is by no means inconsistent with design.

...there are so many different responses that we haven't even begun to understand the molecular mechanism by which our bodies deal with a changing environment...

I'm honestly puzzled by a creationist doctrine in which structures consistent with non-teleological explanations are simultaneously consistent with teleological explanations. Shouldn't we just throw teleological arguments out the window, if this is the case?

As for molecular mechanisms that we don't understand, see Bonhoeffer. Try to locate god in what we know.

You don't see how aspects of a system can be both consistent with evolution and design? I admit that some features are consistent with both ID and evolution, but there are other features that I would argue are definitely inconsistent with evolution. It isn't where the competing views agree that we figure out which one is better, it is where they disagree.

Well you cut out the part that we do understand. I was trying to show how impressive the system is, and that we are just scratching the surface, but you ignored all the parts that we do understand to try to make it sound like it was a God of the gaps argument. The point is that systems are tightly regulated and are amazing at what they do. Our bodies are not just "barely good enough to get by" as someone said they were before.