Atheism vs. God's Existence

[Mister Agenda]

I wouldn't put it anywhere since my creation wouldn't need to eat or breathe in order to not die.

You're talking like God has restrictions to work around. Where did these come from?

I knew you would rather have a discussion of theology than biology. You always want to move toward that route. Again, it is illogical to say that just because life obeys contraints it is not designed. Moreover, just because life is not the way you would like it to be does not mean that it wasn't designed. You don't know what is the optimal anatomy for living systems.None of us do.

I'm not trying to be offensive, but this is the only analogy I can think of to illustrate the problem with the way you guys are thinking. You are basically saying, "why can't life just not need to breathe or eat? Life would be so much better." It's like a child saying "Why can't we print $100,000,000,000 for everybody? Life would be so much better for everyone." The obvious flaw is that you have to have some foresight before you make a statement like that.

You are correct. It just means that if life was designed, the designer was neither omniscient nor omnipotent; or alternatively, he/she/it/they wanted it to look like they weren't Omni-anything.