(May 25, 2016 at 5:55 pm)AAA Wrote: Well you cut out the part that we do understand. I was trying to show how impressive the system is, and that we are just scratching the surface, but you ignored all the parts that we do understand to try to make it sound like it was a God of the gaps argument. The point is that systems are tightly regulated and are amazing at what they do. Our bodies are not just "barely good enough to get by" as someone said they were before.
The problem is that we aren't just scratching the surface. We've discovered a tremendous amount of information about biology (and science in general), and so far, it's every bit as impressive as it is consistent with naturalism, and none of it has supported design.
This is why, when we're confronted with something that we don't understand yet, we don't feel inclined to reach for theism as an answer.
A Gemma is forever.
