AAA Wrote:Ben Davis Wrote:Fossilised bunnies in the Cambrian period.
Remember, I said I wasn't questioning geological time. Also, that would not falsify it, that would just cause them to revise it. Out of place fossils are found all the time. I remember reading about a fossil of a horse giving birth from millions of years ago that wasn't supposed to be where it was. Another common example is the ceolocanth being absent from the fossil record for 65 million years, yet still being alive. These things don't falsify evolution, they just cause the theory to be revised.
What revision in the theory of evolution do you think would account for bunnies in the Precambrian while leaving the basic theory unbroken? The 'horse' fossil you're referring to was an Eohippus, and 40-60 million years old is about right for one of those. The fossil of an actual horse that old would be a major discovery that might force a return to the evolution drawing board, a horse predecessor not so much. Coelacanths moved to deeper waters and left fewer fossils, no revision of evolution required to account for them.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.