Can't prove the supernatural God

[Ignorant]

Ignorant:

Thank you again

Okay, so... what would it mean for something to be "supernatural"? [1]

What I meant by subjective is that a glow-in-the-dark rabbit is now natural because we screwed with it; it just has a new nature. But if we asked if it was natural for a rabbit to glow in the dark, we'd say no. So it depends on the frame of reference. [2]

1) Things can only be said to be "supernatural" relative to a thing's nature. Slugs, by the powers inherent to their nature, cannot create universes () If a slug did create a universe without a change to its nature, then it can be said to have acted "supernaturally", it acted in a way that superseded its natural power.

Slugs cannot naturally sing opera for the sake of beauty. Humans can. Singing opera is supernatural to a slug, and natural to a human (i.e. relative to the nature it is referring to).

2) Exactly, see above. 

Is it natural for a rabbit to glow in the dark? No. 
Is it natural for a glow-in-the-dark rabbit to glow-in-the-dark? Yes.

3) Chad's comment should be noted. I am not using the term "nature" in a strict sense.