RE: Can't prove the supernatural God
June 2, 2016 at 3:07 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2016 at 3:09 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(June 2, 2016 at 2:21 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: I don't immediately turn to a being for whom we've no fucking evidence at all when baffled by the workings of something...
Anything that is observably evident counts as evidence. That's what evidence means. You just don't like the rational conclusions that follow from interpreting that evidence, evidence you clowns can see with your own eyes.
1) Some things change and only things that actually exist can make changes happen.
2) People can observe things in nature that could possibly be or not be since those things can appear, change, and then cease to be.
3) Under specific circumstances, unthinking things that cause change regularly produce a limited range of effects.