Can't prove the supernatural God

[madog]

I do not know what your hangup on the word supernatural is, so call it anything that makes you happy. I'm sticking with the traditional definition. [1]

 

1) Doesn't the fact that there IS a hang-up give us pause to "force" this term?  

3)  I don't think it helps to limit God's activity in this world ONLY to the miraculous and spectacular.

I don't actually have a hang up with the term anymore than all the rest of the man made terms the religious use to some how prove a god.

I have more problems with statements like the highlight text .... and the fact you can say it with a straight face ... and then try to support it by man made evidence?

As a side point, if there was a god (which there isn't) your man made words would have no power to "to limit God's activity" ....