(June 3, 2016 at 6:05 pm)madog Wrote: I don't actually have a hang up with the term anymore than all the rest of the man made terms the religious use to some how prove a god. [1]
I have more problems with statements like the highlight text .... and the fact you can say it with a straight face ... and then try to support it by man made evidence? [2]
As a side point, if there was a god (which there isn't) your man made words would have no power to "to limit God's activity" .... [3]
Welcome to the forums madog! Question:
1) Who is proving that there is a god by using terms like natural and supernatural?
2) Where did I "try to support it by man made evidence"? Can you cite me?
3) I wholeheartedly AGREE with this statement! <= Read that again. Now, because our man-made words have no power to limit any hypothetical god's activity, then those man-made words should be used in a way that corresponds to that lack-of-limiting-power in as much as possible.