Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 16, 2026, 1:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An Old Science book from 1650
#10
RE: An Old Science book from 1650
(June 9, 2016 at 2:27 pm)abaris Wrote:
(June 9, 2016 at 8:40 am)Exian Wrote: So people just went about their day- going to work, eating dinner with their family, doing lawn maintenance- all while believing a bird with a human head existed?

Don't forget the omnipresence of death back then. 1650 was 2 years after the 30 years war ended and between the regular outbreaks of the black death. Apart from the fact that pushing 40 was considered old age back then. People, in the largest part of the world, toiled the fields for some feudal lord.

So, no, they didn't just go about their day in our sense of the word. They were much more focussed on the next life, since it was their only hope. And science was still in it's infancy. Galen was still the ultimate authority when it came to medicine. Humoral pathology was state of the art, even if you could afford a doctor, who, most likely, would only perform some bloodletting as the ultimate therapy.

I happen to own two calendaries from 1647 and 1649. The one from 1649 holds handwritten notes by some monk where he talks about visiting the community and looking after the sick. A very different mindset, indeed. Our mindset would be more fitting for the much further removed classical age than it would fit into the world, only some 360 years in the past.

You know what though, I sometimes like to look at history with the idea that humans haven't changed that much. Sure, the culture has as you've said, but on a basic personal level, I bet they weren't all that different. That is to say, they varied widely just as we do. For every religious text or science book from those times that would have you believe the words contained in them were the center of the world, there were probably people who just didn't give a shit. A moderate for every extreme, at least somewhere. This is all besides the point, though.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply



Messages In This Thread
An Old Science book from 1650 - by Fake Messiah - June 9, 2016 at 6:13 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Little lunch - June 9, 2016 at 6:43 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 9, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Exian - June 9, 2016 at 8:40 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by abaris - June 9, 2016 at 2:27 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Exian - June 9, 2016 at 4:42 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 12:17 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by TubbyTubby - June 9, 2016 at 2:13 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 2:19 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Aoi Magi - June 9, 2016 at 3:03 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by AkiraTheViking - June 9, 2016 at 7:55 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 9, 2016 at 8:04 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by AkiraTheViking - June 9, 2016 at 10:33 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 11:29 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 2:03 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by abaris - June 10, 2016 at 3:52 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Jackalope - June 10, 2016 at 2:47 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 3:05 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Jackalope - June 10, 2016 at 3:16 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 3:25 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Open AI answer to my question "how old is life on earth?" muhammadtaha 6 3183 May 5, 2025 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Any of you fellow old farts had an angioplasty? brewer 1 913 November 4, 2017 at 10:06 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  99 million Year Old Bird Transition Found Amarok 14 8015 June 9, 2017 at 8:41 am
Last Post: Amarok
  OK fellow old farts, have those close to you monitor these. brewer 9 4725 May 2, 2017 at 7:18 am
Last Post: brewer
  Once Again - Science Does Stuff While Religitards Read Their Silly Old Books! Minimalist 6 2243 March 8, 2016 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Bug-killing book pages clean murky drinking water zebo-the-fat 6 2904 August 17, 2015 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: Kitty Galore
  Old Age and Muscular State Arrogant Christian 25 13698 July 29, 2015 at 10:53 pm
Last Post: Arrogant Christian
Thumbs Up Book Recommendations Brometheus 4 2354 April 1, 2015 at 11:45 am
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Thousand year old cure for MRSA superbug? popeyespappy 8 4727 March 31, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  SO THE EVIL EVOLUTIONIST SCIENTIST FIRED MARK H. ARMITAGE FOR DISPROVING OLD EARTH Duke Guilmon 13 9283 July 28, 2014 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Duke Guilmon



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)