(April 28, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote: BTW, sounds like you have a desperate asshole on your hands there.
Many, in fact. My sample "conversation" was actually a paraphrasing of ongoing objections by various amateur apologists.
Then again, that is the very essence of apologetics. It's not about finding out what's really going on or what really happened in the past. It's about finding reasons to believe in a story that has already been admitted to be a matter of faith. The festival of ad hocs should have been no surprise.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
