RE: Evidence for Jesus Christ?
May 2, 2011 at 3:00 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2011 at 3:05 pm by Minimalist.)
(May 2, 2011 at 2:02 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:(May 2, 2011 at 1:58 pm)Minimalist Wrote: But they left in Hannibal? And Attila? And Alaric? And Arminius? And Caligula? And Nero?
Instead they spent all that time and effort to rid themselves of referenes to a ridiculous preacher?
It's a ludicrous assumption.
None of those guys had secret god-powers that everyone feared and had to suppress knowledge of, Min-dear.
They were all real, Luv. As opposed to the god boy.
Another myth to dispose of is the notion that scribbling monks kept "knowledge alive" in the Dark Ages. They copied and recopied tedious xtian drivel. It wasn't until the Crusades that Western Europe reacquired some idea of what had been lost through contact with the Arabs.
The church only gave a shit about documents which supported their silly superstitions which is why the interpolated Josephus survived while the history of Justus of Tiberius was allowed to rot away.
Quote:I've heard that some historians think there was a real "King Arthur" in history.
But there was an Artorius Castus...
http://www.celtic-twilight.com/camelot/i...lucius.htm
He has two inscriptions. What has jesus got?
