(July 23, 2016 at 2:34 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(July 23, 2016 at 12:35 pm)RobertE Wrote: I read your response and replied to it. I didn't actually say that "you", were being misleading in any way. And I do apologise should I have given that impression.
This is a distinction without a difference. Saying that my words are misleading, in a format where I am only known only by words, is calling me misleading. Thanks for your apology. Moving right along --
(July 23, 2016 at 12:35 pm)RobertE Wrote: Part of your quote:
... and the whole of it, so that you don't, ahem, mislead others by removing the context:
(July 23, 2016 at 12:26 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The video posts upthread indicates a home-grown origin, but I sure don't know enough to form a cogent view.
So yeah, there's that. You realize that quote-mining is against the rules, right?
Then take away the reputation away from me then. I sure didn't earn it.