RE: 13 Questions
May 17, 2011 at 7:52 pm
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2011 at 8:11 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
I can't say I really agree with your reasons as to why you can say the words were created by man. I think even if they were in a language you didn't understand, or even if it was just the drawing of the sun you would still infer they were created by men. This is because all of these things contain information, and we know that information only originates from a mind. So I think applying this to DNA, the greatest information message we have ever seen is completely legitimate. Your thoughts?
I actually think you can use the message itself to infer the existence of the messenger and apparently so does NASA. We have never scientifically observed extra terrestrial life, however the former SETL program was all based on inferring the existence of E.T.L. simply by receiving a message that may have been sent by an E.T.L. mind. They (NASA) even said that a message highlighting all the prime numbers would have been considered positive proof of E.T.L. - but now think about if something as amazingly complex as the DNA-RNA system was transmitted through numbers, the guys at NASA would have gone crazy with joy because they would have realized its implications
As to your second point about Bob- you will find that once you give Bob all the necessary attributes in order to be able to create the universe and life you will find that he quickly becomes the God of the Bible just by a different name and not a toaster at all.
I feel you got onto pretty shaky ground when you said we know where DNA came from and how life evolved on Earth, seems to be begging the question a bit. Seeing some mutations and changes in computer code as it is replicated is not nearly enough evidence for me to affirm that Windows 7 arose by natural means even if I didn't know anything about computers. Information always comes from a mind.