(September 2, 2016 at 5:17 pm)Jesster Wrote:(September 2, 2016 at 5:14 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: If you say so?
Ah. So it has come to one-line non-answers. No need to add anything useful. I will take this as you conceding in the argument until you say otherwise.
It was a quick answer, because I was trying not to change subjects. The problem for materialist and many atheists, is in providing a foundation for their moral view. Even in moral pragmatism, one can very easily reason, to killing a group of people. It is going to be determined by your moral purpose and goal. When asking "why"; to a moral relativist, it very often comes back, to because "I said so".
So we are left with who is saying so! Who decides the purpose and function that the morals are based on? I think that God, as creator has that right. Now in the case of sexual immortality, I do believe that it is harmful; and that it changes our views into something ugly and unhealthy. I know that I regret my sins in this area.
