I don't believe in Christianity primarily because of the brain

[Mister Agenda]

I found a scientifically based theory that somewhat incorporates a religious concept. Then call people out for being intellectually dishonest when ever they only want to speak from a position of authority, of the religious component negatively, and not make themselves aware of the scientific aspects.

How is that different than what you did? I provided A and B aspects to an argument, and call out those who only speak to A for being intellectually dishonest if they refuse to acknowledge or even educate themselves on the "b" side of the argument before they speak.

You are calling me for not knowing the entomology of A and B Intellectually dishonest.

Nice try sport, but no. Maybe if you didnt get so worked up over how a word was spell-t you could take a little more time framing out how they are used, then someone like me couldn't take you to task for the intellectual dishonesty built into your fallacy of faulty comparison arguement.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tool...Comparison

You found a speculation loosely based on science and credited it with actually being a scientific theory. Then you showed your ass in all directions because you're not even capable of understanding why you're wrong, apparently.

I'll leave the 'entomology' bit alone, since apparently pointing out that you've used the wrong word or misspelled the one you intended to use causes you to have a little meltdown.