RE: I don't believe in Christianity primarily because of the brain
September 8, 2016 at 3:56 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2016 at 3:58 pm by Crossless2.0.)
Sure, I get it. You referenced an article about a "theory" that doesn't rise to the level of theory (and arguably not even a scientific hypothesis) and that provides no evidence for its speculations. Yet you want to cite it as evidence that "science" doesn't rule out the possibility of a soul, however ill-defined 'soul' may be, and you decline to take any responsibility for providing anything like a workable definition that might be fruitful in a scientific context.
Yeah, I get it just fine.
Yeah, I get it just fine.