RE: I don't believe in Christianity primarily because of the brain
September 8, 2016 at 8:18 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2016 at 8:25 pm by Faith No More.)
(September 8, 2016 at 3:56 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Sure, I get it. You referenced an article about a "theory" that doesn't rise to the level of theory (and arguably not even a scientific hypothesis) and that provides no evidence for its speculations. Yet you want to cite it as evidence that "science" doesn't rule out the possibility of a soul, however ill-defined 'soul' may be, and you decline to take any responsibility for providing anything like a workable definition that might be fruitful in a scientific context.
Yeah, I get it just fine.
Not only does it not rise to the level of theory, it turns out that any comments that criticize biocentrism are deleted.
https://ronmurp.net/tag/biocentrism/
And can't find it anymore, but I read somewhere that not only does Lanza delete any criticisms, he refuses to actually debate it with a physicist. So much for the "peer-review" part of the scientific method.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
