RE: Evidence for Jesus Christ?
May 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2011 at 1:38 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 20, 2011 at 11:26 am)RDK Wrote: I wasn't looking for a rehash of junior high biology. This question about the source for plant production was intended to make you think about the mechanism involved into the formation of plant product. Carbon left all by itself does not create anything. There is definitely a process, that once started, fuels life. The oddity here is not that it does it. We can all observe the mechanism working. Its the working part which is the miracle. The carbon is the fuel for the device, but without the device there is nothing to make the carbon change into anything else. The strangest part of this is that the device has to be fully functional before it can process carbon in the first place. So there must have been some prior mechanism to start this whole process going. That's where the evolution/creation debate begins. The difficulty about evolution is that it requires fully functional mechanisms to adapt themselves to new environments without direction.
Rehash of junior high schoold biology is the only avenune open to you that would give you opportunity to be less of a idiot then you are now. To actually be a lesser idiot you will need to also abandon your god and follow modern biology until you've e demonstrated a good fundamental grasp of the critical details.
Before that only thing you might make people think about is just how few working neurons it takes to string words together into semi-coherent sentences, and what a discredit it is to the concept of christ it is - if more discredited it can indeed be - to be championed by ignorant morons who rehash the same old creationist bullshit in its name, such as you.